Current Issue:

In the April 7 issue:
What Is Nielsen's Plan For Radio?
On The Cover:
Nielsen's Farshad Family

Click here to subscribe to Radio Ink.

Radio Ink Writers

User Feedback

FM Translators For Everyone

Add a Comment

(9/19/2013 7:49:22 PM)   Flag as inappropriate content
AM SYNCHRONOUS BOOSTERS (Synchronized by a 10 Mhz. satellite signal) have been very successful in PUERTO RICO.
WISO-AM operates three synchronized transmitters on 1260KHz. and WAPA-AM operates two synchronized transmitters on 680 kHz. for many years.
Continental broadcasters are welcomed to experience how great they work. It's a great tool for AM revitalization.

(9/19/2013 6:30:46 PM)   Flag as inappropriate content
3. The flawed idea that the FCC is obligated to fix something that was caused by evolution of technology and the market. Are you still clinging to dialup modems and claiming you should still be able to dial into your AOL account when broadband technology has replaced it? No? So why is it the government's obligation to preserve outdated technology? I'm betting most of you would decry bailouts and "big government" - until it suddenly props up your business.
- Chris Stevens
(9/19/2013 6:28:04 PM)   Flag as inappropriate content
Couple of points:

1. many AM broadcasters now were more than happy to cash out their FMs during rounds of consolidation craziness. The fact they surrendered these signals for a quick payoff shouldn't entitle them to be bailed out now.

2. The illusion that AM is some sort of nirvana of localism is simply false. Yes, we all know the really local AM station with high school sports and the swap shop - but for every one of those, I can find you ten that are simply satellite repeaters.

- Chris Stevens
(9/19/2013 3:09:27 PM)   Flag as inappropriate content

I very much like the proposal offered FCC Commissioner Mignon Clyburn.

Based on the comments made by contributors, it's not perfect but it's a great step in the right direction.

This will definitely help many AM stations!

- Joe B
(9/19/2013 2:12:19 PM)   Flag as inappropriate content
In response to Chris Stevens, I hardly would say it's the fault of AM owners and blame it on a lack of "oversight". Broadcasting is expensive! A lot of AM owners that offer excellent programming would've loved to join the FM crowd, however without the big bucks backed by corporate or multiple shareholders, it's not been possible. New media combined with expanding FM service is a lot to blame, too. When a full service FM is granted 3 translators in one market -- it's a bit ridiculous! And HD too!
- RadioGuy423
(9/19/2013 10:41:19 AM)   Flag as inappropriate content
now all the lazy generic FM sound-a-like clone corporate radio stations in my area will learn a serious financial lesson. Live and Local Radio!
- AM Owner
(9/19/2013 8:41:59 AM)   Flag as inappropriate content
Broadcasters did not cause the problems that afflict AM. Yes, the FCC should be responsible to find a solution, because they broke "it"! Who was it that lowered interference standards & have always voted to allow more new forms of electrical interference to harm AM reception? The FCC!!! Also, allow up to 10% weekly hours of sep programming on AM-fed translators. I have two sports franchises ($$$) that want to be on-air at the same time - give me the flexibility to make $$$
- Iconoclast

Add a Comment