Current Issue:

In the April 7 issue:
What Is Nielsen's Plan For Radio?
On The Cover:
Nielsen's Farshad Family

Click here to subscribe to Radio Ink.

Radio Ink Writers

User Feedback

A 25-Year Secret Revealed

Add a Comment

(9/13/2013 7:51:36 AM)   Flag as inappropriate content
5llbH2 Im obliged for the blog.Really thank you! Great.
- NY
(9/6/2013 7:47:20 AM)   Flag as inappropriate content
C9j7OR Major thankies for the article post.Much thanks again. Awesome.
- NY
(4/10/2013 6:22:15 PM)   Flag as inappropriate content
Maybe there's a "ballpark" figure of occasions-per-week that matches the daypart requirements and achieves the frequency-goal.(?)
- Ronald T. Robinson
(4/10/2013 1:12:31 PM)   Flag as inappropriate content
Always enjoy the info from The Wiz!

I wish we HAD the TAPSCAN info... our market is not rated. Sioux Falls, SD is big enough to BE rated, but the two big companies here decided to quit buying the numbers.

My wife and I started the ONLY locally owned station about three years ago. There have never been ratings since our inception.

I have paid to have telephone surveys done to see how we're doing (pretty darn good) but we do not have the same data.

Any advice for MY situation?

- John Small
(4/10/2013 10:50:19 AM)   Flag as inappropriate content
The net reach number increases with a 52 week schedule. Why not use the 52 week net reach to determine a more accurate (and lower) cost per person?


Too much sleep between repetitions is why we don't use a 52-week net reach. It's important that we not fool ourselves into believing we have sufficient weekly frequency when we, in fact, do not. And as long as we always use the same 7-day/3-frequency metric when comparing efficiencies between schedules, the comparison

- Gary
(4/10/2013 8:50:37 AM)   Flag as inappropriate content
This all makes sense. What I'm wondering is: Do you take steps to make sure you get decent rotations? When I was in radio, one of the fights I got tired of fighting was the one where media buyers demanded narrowed dayparts. The problem with say, 7-9am is that when enough advertisers get that, those who were supposed to get 6a-10am tend to get their spots jammed into 6a-7a and 9a-10a. That will throw off your reach and frequency by a mile.
- Jerry Stevens
(4/10/2013 7:51:29 AM)   Flag as inappropriate content
Even while this article may curdle a lot of cream in broadcasters' morning coffee, Roy has (again) nailed it.

However, like other experts who are communicating in a restricted form, he has, I believe, glossed over a most significant part: "...I’ll take responsibility for the copy..."

In other words: It's hard to massage without a message. Thanks, Roy. You da man.

- Ronald T. Robinson

Add a Comment