Making Radio Stronger In A Disaster
User Feedback
Borchetta: Pandora's Business Model Is Not My Problem
Add a Comment
(3/18/2013 11:29:25 PM) Flag as inappropriate content
T1svnh <a href="http://pmvxjdvygvsx.com/">pmvxjdvygvsx</a>, [url=http://zqdbwrtrlrwy.com/]zqdbwrtrlrwy[/url], [link=http://hypzxccxbaas.com/]hypzxccxbaas[/link], http://ugjxemgnkuwo.com/
Anyone who thinks Pandora is a distribution model, doesn't know Pandora. Like radio, it's more a promotional vehicle than anything else. Being able to listen to music that one prefers over a random playlist put together by Who Knows, is a much better experience than traditional radio. The fact that one can create a station based on a favorite artist and then discover other artists that are similar is a much more targeted than radio.
Re: "...just how much more money does Taylor Swift, Tim McGraw, Rascal Flats need at the expense of hard working small market announcers and stations?"
Substitute John Hogan, Lew Dickey, and Alfred C. Liggins, III for Swift, McGraw, and Rascal Flats... and the question is just as valid.
Scott's comments are refreshing. Pandora is
no more than a wired juke box. It is the same concept as Muzak. Muzak delivered songs over
telco lines. As to Panadora, it is a wanabe radio
station, but it is not. It is similar to Muzak but delivered over the web. But it does not lack for Chutzpah.
It is now critical of radio, which it wants to be but is not. An ideal solution is to make all fees for radio performance combined and include ASCAP, BMI,and performers, with one monthly payment.
Does not matter about Pandora. Bottom line, Pandora is a distribution means for music. Nothing more than that. Just give it a little time, and Google will devise a "better mousetrap" for music distribution. They will make Pandora irrelevent.
just how much more money does Taylor Swift, Tim McGraw, Rascal Flats need at the expense of hard working small market announcers and stations? following Scott Borchetta line of thinking - hey its not my problem! taylor, tim and the rascals got all the money they need, they can do without.
Add a Comment
Add a Comment
(3/18/2013 11:29:25 PM) Flag as inappropriate content
T1svnh <a href="http://pmvxjdvygvsx.com/">pmvxjdvygvsx</a>, [url=http://zqdbwrtrlrwy.com/]zqdbwrtrlrwy[/url], [link=http://hypzxccxbaas.com/]hypzxccxbaas[/link], http://ugjxemgnkuwo.com/
- NY
(2/18/2013 3:52:35 PM) Flag as inappropriate contentAnyone who thinks Pandora is a distribution model, doesn't know Pandora. Like radio, it's more a promotional vehicle than anything else. Being able to listen to music that one prefers over a random playlist put together by Who Knows, is a much better experience than traditional radio. The fact that one can create a station based on a favorite artist and then discover other artists that are similar is a much more targeted than radio.
- martin
(2/18/2013 1:04:44 PM) Flag as inappropriate contentRe: "...just how much more money does Taylor Swift, Tim McGraw, Rascal Flats need at the expense of hard working small market announcers and stations?"
Substitute John Hogan, Lew Dickey, and Alfred C. Liggins, III for Swift, McGraw, and Rascal Flats... and the question is just as valid.
- anonymous
(2/15/2013 3:50:30 PM) Flag as inappropriate contentScott's comments are refreshing. Pandora is
no more than a wired juke box. It is the same concept as Muzak. Muzak delivered songs over
telco lines. As to Panadora, it is a wanabe radio
station, but it is not. It is similar to Muzak but delivered over the web. But it does not lack for Chutzpah.
It is now critical of radio, which it wants to be but is not. An ideal solution is to make all fees for radio performance combined and include ASCAP, BMI,and performers, with one monthly payment.
- SAUL LEVINE (KKGO FM)
(2/15/2013 10:02:08 AM) Flag as inappropriate contentDoes not matter about Pandora. Bottom line, Pandora is a distribution means for music. Nothing more than that. Just give it a little time, and Google will devise a "better mousetrap" for music distribution. They will make Pandora irrelevent.
- Bob
(2/15/2013 9:20:09 AM) Flag as inappropriate contentjust how much more money does Taylor Swift, Tim McGraw, Rascal Flats need at the expense of hard working small market announcers and stations? following Scott Borchetta line of thinking - hey its not my problem! taylor, tim and the rascals got all the money they need, they can do without.
-
Add a Comment
