Current Issue:



September 8:
The Radio Show Issue
Emmis CEO Jeff Smulyan




Click here to subscribe to Radio Ink.






Radio Ink Writers




















User Feedback

What if Radio Paid Like Pandora Pays?



Add a Comment

(10/25/2013 11:09:24 AM)   Flag as inappropriate content
yrqAbm I think this is a real great article post.Much thanks again. Cool.
- NY
(11/25/2012 8:21:13 AM)   Flag as inappropriate content
Few would argue that fairness across platforms - AM/FM/Shortwave/Online/TV/Movies or the local peeler-bar - is not an unreasonable outcome for all concerned.

What I have never understood and I mean - forever - is why the artists have never participated in these royalties. That so sucks for someone who didn't write or publish the tunes.

- Ronald T. Robinson
(11/23/2012 9:28:53 PM)   Flag as inappropriate content
OK, Sitll noone wants to look at this realistically. Everyone is living in the fantasy world that radio is over. It has be pronounced dead more times then some recenet celebrities by unifomrmed bloggers. To simply look at this from a royaly point of view is like looking at company cash flow only from the income side and ignoring expenses,

Point one: Anyone who thinks any webcaster can influence music purchases like radio is dellusional.

Point Two: If you balance the sales and promotional effect of radio air play against potential royalties, it is realistic to compute than the arist would owe more than ten times the royalty bill even offset by the royalty bill.

Point Three: The real issue hear is that the record companies have yet to come up with a fair share with artists. They now want to stick radio with the bill.

Point Four: All the pressure should be broght on ASCAP and BMI to share the fees broadcasters already pay in an equitable manner.

- Frank Zappala
(11/21/2012 6:12:23 PM)   Flag as inappropriate content
If big & little stations charged the artists/record companies to play the music there would be no music on the radio and music radio would be a stinking corpse.

Meanwhile, I still am missing how an internet station based in, say, Belize, would be charged by anybody else because residents of this or that country went online to hear some tunes. I mean, who gets the invoice and who has the authority to collect?

- Ronald T. Robinson
(11/21/2012 2:42:24 PM)   Flag as inappropriate content


And if big and little artists and big and little record companies had to pay regular advertising rates to get their recorded product advertised, exposed and promoted, as all other companies pay to advertise their products and services, they would pay billions in advertising dollars to big and little radio stations.
I say equalize the artists and record companies with all other companies and charge them regular advertising rates to advertise, expose and promote their recorded product.

- Tony Coloff
(11/21/2012 1:44:40 PM)   Flag as inappropriate content
Re: "Radio is not a dying industry, try asking a real audience who depended on broadcast radio during the recent storms... Broadcast Radio is NOT all about music, if you think it is, then you don't know radio or ever worked successfully in it."

Haven't heard anyone with knowledge say radio is dying, but its business model is changing. As for your "...asking a real audience...", do you realize how pompous this sounds? Not all broadcasters on the East Coast participated in warning the public - some just played music.

Another arrogant statement is "Broadcast Radio is NOT all about music, if you think it is, then you don't know radio or ever worked successfully in it." This sounds like a member of the Tea Party calling anyone who disagrees unpatriotic. I spent 2 decades successfully competing in major market radio, and nearly another decade paying my dues to get there, just like hundreds of people who have been warning of this digital change for radio.

Ronald, about your "...wonder what stops internet broadcasters from originating off-shore..." Where your servers are located isn't what's paid on, it's where your listeners reside. Triton Digital's September "Webcast Metrics" reports 99.2% of Clear Channel E&M's Mon-Fri Average Active Sessions are from the U.S., with Cumulus showing 98.%. Pandora's audience was 100% U.S. (Pandora started streaming in Australia last month.)

Reaching audience in other lands means each company needs to pay performance royalties in the country of residence for the listener.

Here's a fact: The U.S. is one of only five other counties where broadcasters do not pay this performance royalty. The others are China, Iran, North Korea, Rwanda.

Please note: I am not for paying this "performance fee," especially to new artists seeking exposure. For me it has come to the point where having broadcasters not pay puts them into a class that doesn't exist, and it gives an unfair advantage. What's good for one music-intensive business is good for another.

It got this way because broadcasters didn't say a word when others were getting hammered with fees.

- Ken Dardis
(11/21/2012 1:42:31 PM)   Flag as inappropriate content
actually Andy if you look up public records Pandora paid 136 million in royalties for 2011 and because listening is up this year I would expect them to pay more than that for 2012
- Guest


Add a Comment




 
Advertisements

Advertisements