Making Radio Stronger In A Disaster
User Feedback
READ COMMENTS ABOUT SUPREME INDECENCY CASE
Add a Comment
(4/9/2012 3:26:18 AM) Flag as inappropriate content
Òîëüêî ëó÷øàÿ îóâü â ìàãàçèíå Sapato http://sapato-kupit.ru
<a href=http://sapato-kupit.ru>îáóâü ëëîéä èíòåðíåò ìàãàçèí</a>
<a href=http://sapato-kupit.ru>îáóâü &#
Ïðèâåò! ýíåðæè äèåò îöåíèòå ôîòî ÿ òîëñòàÿ ïðîñòîé ïóòü ê ñíèæåíèþ âåñà ëó÷øèå ÷àè ä&#
Ïðèâåò! êðîññîâêè àíòèëîïà èíòåðíåò ìàãàçèí äîñòàâêà ïî ìàðèóïîëþ ñïîðòèâíîé îáó
Ïðèâåò! 1001 ñóìêà èíòåðíåò ìàãàçèí èíòåðíåò ìàãàçèí îáóâè reebok ðåçèíîâûå ñàïîãè keddo èíòåðí
Thanks! Cool photo!
Brian is right."Congress shall pass NO law..." Somehow this basic philosophy has served us well in the print media for over 200 years. What constitutional distinction could possibly be drawn between free speech in a newspaper and free speech over a broadcast? If broadcasting had existed in the days of the Constitution's framing, do you really think the founding fathers would have made a distinction? Before you answer that remember: the First Amendment protects: a.the right of assembly, b.the right of free speech, and c. freedom of the press, as close a definition of the constituent parts of broadcasting as was possible about 125 years before its existence. Shall a distinction be drawn between methods of communication that existed at the time of the Constitution's framing and those that came after? - I think not.
I for one am not looking forward to the onslaught of garbage that will ensue if if these rules are struck down, but I'd rather endure that than any exception to the First Amendment.
No citizen in a truly free country should ever need to worry about the government when they speak or express themselves.
True liberty is more than just an individual’s freedom from constraint. It is also an individual’s responsibility to protect another person’s freedom from abuse. The tension that exists between the two allows for a civil discussion of pertinent issues which recognizes the need to protect the interest of the young, the vulnerable and those who hold opposing views. For decades celebrities and others who are morally challenged have been successful in jettisoning the true meaning of liberty replacing it with excessive, undisciplined behavior without concern or compassion towards others. The people have a compelling interest in preserving the true meaning of liberty, keeping the balance between personal freedom and responsibility towards others in tact in order to preserve both liberty and the stability of our nation.
Add a Comment
Add a Comment
(4/9/2012 3:26:18 AM) Flag as inappropriate content
Òîëüêî ëó÷øàÿ îóâü â ìàãàçèíå Sapato http://sapato-kupit.ru
<a href=http://sapato-kupit.ru>îáóâü ëëîéä èíòåðíåò ìàãàçèí</a>
<a href=http://sapato-kupit.ru>îáóâü &#
- BakDooda
(4/1/2012 7:06:35 AM) Flag as inappropriate contentÏðèâåò! ýíåðæè äèåò îöåíèòå ôîòî ÿ òîëñòàÿ ïðîñòîé ïóòü ê ñíèæåíèþ âåñà ëó÷øèå ÷àè ä&#
- HisteHiededa
(3/27/2012 5:18:43 PM) Flag as inappropriate contentÏðèâåò! êðîññîâêè àíòèëîïà èíòåðíåò ìàãàçèí äîñòàâêà ïî ìàðèóïîëþ ñïîðòèâíîé îáó
- inaredrirty
(3/27/2012 5:18:25 PM) Flag as inappropriate contentÏðèâåò! 1001 ñóìêà èíòåðíåò ìàãàçèí èíòåðíåò ìàãàçèí îáóâè reebok ðåçèíîâûå ñàïîãè keddo èíòåðí
- inaredrirty
(1/12/2012 4:42:30 PM) Flag as inappropriate contentThanks! Cool photo!
- editojem
(1/11/2012 7:33:07 PM) Flag as inappropriate contentBrian is right."Congress shall pass NO law..." Somehow this basic philosophy has served us well in the print media for over 200 years. What constitutional distinction could possibly be drawn between free speech in a newspaper and free speech over a broadcast? If broadcasting had existed in the days of the Constitution's framing, do you really think the founding fathers would have made a distinction? Before you answer that remember: the First Amendment protects: a.the right of assembly, b.the right of free speech, and c. freedom of the press, as close a definition of the constituent parts of broadcasting as was possible about 125 years before its existence. Shall a distinction be drawn between methods of communication that existed at the time of the Constitution's framing and those that came after? - I think not.
I for one am not looking forward to the onslaught of garbage that will ensue if if these rules are struck down, but I'd rather endure that than any exception to the First Amendment.
No citizen in a truly free country should ever need to worry about the government when they speak or express themselves.
- J.P. Ferraro
(1/11/2012 4:26:47 PM) Flag as inappropriate contentTrue liberty is more than just an individual’s freedom from constraint. It is also an individual’s responsibility to protect another person’s freedom from abuse. The tension that exists between the two allows for a civil discussion of pertinent issues which recognizes the need to protect the interest of the young, the vulnerable and those who hold opposing views. For decades celebrities and others who are morally challenged have been successful in jettisoning the true meaning of liberty replacing it with excessive, undisciplined behavior without concern or compassion towards others. The people have a compelling interest in preserving the true meaning of liberty, keeping the balance between personal freedom and responsibility towards others in tact in order to preserve both liberty and the stability of our nation.
- Jeff Atherholt
Add a Comment
