Current Issue:

Coming Up July 28:
The 40 Most Powerful
People in Radio

Plus: The 2014 Lifetime Leadership Award

Click here to subscribe to Radio Ink.

Radio Ink Writers

User Feedback

Are You Still Dropping The "Y" Bomb?

Add a Comment

(11/2/2011 12:20:15 PM)   Flag as inappropriate content
To clarify even further: I have never met Nun Yorbiz nor did I know of him/her before I wrote the piece.

If he/she was thinking I wrote that article only for him/her, there is an issue here that could stand for a reconsideration. And it has to do with perceptual vs verifiable realities.

This "You"-thingie sure has roots. Roots that are bigger and go deeper than any ol' oak tree.

- Ronald T. Robinson
(11/1/2011 8:27:05 PM)   Flag as inappropriate content
That is spectacularly astute, Nun! And I really mean that as I'm grinning like that Cheshire cat.

Indeed, that was the title - as supplied by our generous and overworked editor, "Ed the Ed".

I'm actually quite pleased that someone noted the distinction... and the irony.

I'm too new here to start messin' with Ed as he's the one with the huge functional biceps, big megaphone and "delete" button. :)

- Ronald T. Robinson
(11/1/2011 8:35:49 AM)   Flag as inappropriate content
Is WHO still dropping the Y bomb? For a moment I thought you were writing directly to me, but then I had the scathing realization that no, there must be hundreds or thousands of others to whom you were addressing this message...therefore suddenly I feel betrayed that you Ronald, used the Y bomb in the title of this untenable article. Hmmm.
- Nun Yorbiz
(10/26/2011 11:15:30 AM)   Flag as inappropriate content
Allow me to clarify even further: Not only can we "have it both ways" - we can have it all ways.

Plus, if the Talent should also be "compelling, relevant and unique".... even better.

Adding more resources and options to already-skilled Talent can only be good for all concerned.

- Ronald T. Robinson
(10/25/2011 5:55:20 PM)   Flag as inappropriate content
Those comments, withheld, presume the issue is a binary one - either I'm talking directly to an individual or I'm not.

It's the Middle Ground I'm promoting - the most effective position.

Any broadcaster would agree: The booth is a stimulating and exciting but still ridiculous environment - hidden in a room, behind a microphone talking to nobody knows who. In other words, while most treat this as a Direct Medium (one-to-one), the unquestioned reality and fact is: we are working in an Indirect Medium - one-to-uhhh... ummm...?

I have heard these objections once or twice before and can only invite the performer or manager to continue their considerations. I'll do my best to make it a worthwhile exercise.

- Ronald T. Robinson
(10/24/2011 3:25:37 PM)   Flag as inappropriate content
Well - to me that's just more gibberish. You can't possibly have it both ways. It's one-to-one or it isn't. If it is, then it's very personal communication delivered by professionals who know how to be compelling, relevant, and unique. The good ones stick out and the the bad ones are talking heads.
- withheld
(10/21/2011 9:25:41 PM)   Flag as inappropriate content
I should have added: At no time have I suggested that Radio is not a personal medium. Of course it is and how could it not be - individuals are listening. What I do say is, "There is no 'Personal Listener' - exclusively."

That is the distinction that has been soiling our undies for... like... forever?

- Ronald T. Robinson

Add a Comment