Current Issue:

Current Issue
On The Cover:
Kenny Chesney

The CRS Issue
Best Country PDs in America

Click here to subscribe to Radio Ink.

Radio Ink Writers

User Feedback

Who Are You Really Talking To Out There?

Add a Comment

(10/31/2013 7:11:57 AM)   Flag as inappropriate content
P8N8KG Major thankies for the article. Really Great.
- NY
(10/26/2013 12:35:52 AM)   Flag as inappropriate content
lf6Jpr Very good blog article.Much thanks again. Cool.
- NY
(9/13/2013 1:58:42 PM)   Flag as inappropriate content
DUG1Gn Thanks for the blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Great.
- NY
(9/13/2013 11:55:33 AM)   Flag as inappropriate content
Rx9oW6 Very informative article.Really thank you! Keep writing.
- NY
(9/5/2013 1:19:46 PM)   Flag as inappropriate content
CozoTj Say, you got a nice post. Will read on...
- NY
(11/4/2011 9:14:03 PM)   Flag as inappropriate content
Meanwhile, as Jock (perhaps understandably) accuses me of promoting an "impersonal" style, I am obliged to make the important distinction.

There is no need for a performer to connect at a personal level - that is, one-to-one. Besides, it's not being done now; it's never been done and it can't be done - unless a comment is directed to a named listener. Not without suffering the penalties the of rejecting a majority of other listeners in the process.

The priority is for the Personality to be PERSONABLE. That is, someone who a Listener finds compelling, entertaining, genuine, interesting etc.

Humongous distinction here and one which I hope more Radio-folk will be beginning to realize.

- Ronald T. Robinson
(11/4/2011 8:25:02 AM)   Flag as inappropriate content
Even as "Jock" offers some respect in his disagreement, we are still going to have these discussions.

Here's a distinction: I'm not talking about a jock's approach. I'm talking about a jock's targeting and... about a Listener's reality... parts of which a jock can influence, adjust, verify, distort, enhance etc, etc.

The ability of a Talent to have options and make choices in their deliveries could only be of benefit to anyone involved. I haven't eliminated or suppressed anything about a jock's presentation. In practice, I am protecting a jock from crashing the reality of a majority of a given audience at any one time.

Meanwhile, that a bazillion radio-folk have made the one-to-one assumption since the hundred thousand watt AM'er in Galilee, C-ROM, ("Caesar's Rome Rocks The Known World") signed on, is no demonstration of its validity or the value of its continued use.

As to the undisguised, dis-repectful assumption of "puny opposition": That's possible. Or maybe I just kept tripping and falling into gold mines and bank vaults... year after year after year.

I do appreciate how it wouldn't serve anyone (likely a majority) sharing Jock's position, however, to include the possibility that another skill-set made up of different approaches might have been a deciding factor.

- Ronald T. Robinson

  Next ->

Add a Comment